Search for Indicators

Disparities Dashboard

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

green chart bars Significantly better than the overall value

red chart bars Significantly worse than the overall value

dark blue chart bars Significantly different than the overall value

light blue chart bars No significant difference with the overall value

gray chart bars No data on significance available

More information about the gauges and icons

County: Alcona

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona

Health / Cancer

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Cancer

Current Value:
179.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 179.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 168.4 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 177.6.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 179.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 162.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 179.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,085 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (160.6), Alcona has a value of 179.6 which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(160.6)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (149.4), Alcona has a value of 179.6 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(149.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (179.6) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (178.7).
Prior Value
(178.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (122.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Age-Adjusted Death Rate due to Lung Cancer

Current Value:
45.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 45.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 43.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.4.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 45.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 42.5 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 50.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,752 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (40.6), Alcona has a value of 45.3 which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(40.6)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0), Alcona has a value of 45.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(35.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (45.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (48.5).
Prior Value
(48.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona All Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Alcona All Cancer Incidence Rate

441.3
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 441.3 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 430.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 456.4.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 441.3 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 455.6 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 485.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,693 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (438.2), Alcona has a value of 441.3 which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(438.2)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (442.3), Alcona has a value of 441.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(442.3)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (441.3) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (434.8).
Prior Value
(434.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Cancer: Medicare Population

Current Value:
9.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 9.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (11.0%), Alcona has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.0%), Alcona has a value of 9.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (9.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.0%).
Prior Value
(9.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
36.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 36.0 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.1.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 81 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 36.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 40.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 46.1.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,401 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (35.6), Alcona has a value of 36.0 which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(35.6)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (36.5), Alcona has a value of 36.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(36.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (36.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (32.5).
Prior Value
(32.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Lung and Bronchus Cancer Incidence Rate

Current Value:
68.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 68.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 62.7 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 70.0.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 82 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 68.9 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 74.4.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 2,471 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (59.6), Alcona has a value of 68.9 which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(59.6)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (54.0), Alcona has a value of 68.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(54.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (68.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (66.1).
Prior Value
(66.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona

Health / Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona Adults 20+ with Diabetes

Current Value:

County: Alcona Adults 20+ with Diabetes

7.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 7.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 8.7%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 7.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (7.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (8.0%).
Prior Value
(8.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Diabetes: Medicare Population

Current Value:
24.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 24.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 25.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (25.0%), Alcona has a value of 24.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(25.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (24.0%), Alcona has a value of 24.0%.
US Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (24.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (24.0%).
Prior Value
(24.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona

Health / Disabilities

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona Children with a Disability

Current Value:
6.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (4.8%), Alcona has a value of 6.2%.
MI Value
(4.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (4.5%), Alcona has a value of 6.2%.
US Value
(4.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alcona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Persons with a Cognitive Difficulty

Current Value:
8.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (6.0%), Alcona has a value of 8.3%.
MI Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (5.3%), Alcona has a value of 8.3%.
US Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alcona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Persons with a Disability

Current Value:

County: Alcona Persons with a Disability

23.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (14.1%), Alcona has a value of 23.0%.
MI Value
(14.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.9%), Alcona has a value of 23.0%.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (23.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (23.7%).
Prior Value
(23.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Persons with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
9.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (3.8%), Alcona has a value of 9.1%.
MI Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.6%), Alcona has a value of 9.1%.
US Value
(3.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (9.1%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9.5%).
Prior Value
(9.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Persons with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
3.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (2.8%), Alcona has a value of 3.9%.
MI Value
(2.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.6%), Alcona has a value of 3.9%.
US Value
(2.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (3.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (3.8%).
Prior Value
(3.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Persons with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
2.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (2.2%), Alcona has a value of 2.8%.
MI Value
(2.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Alcona has a value of 2.8%.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (2.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (2.9%).
Prior Value
(2.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Persons with an Ambulatory Difficulty

Current Value:
12.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (7.2%), Alcona has a value of 12.7%.
MI Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.7%), Alcona has a value of 12.7%.
US Value
(6.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (12.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12.7%).
Prior Value
(12.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona

Health / Health Care Access & Quality

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona Adults with Health Insurance: 18-64

Current Value:
90.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 90.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 92.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 91.2%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 90.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 82.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (92.9%), Alcona has a value of 90.8% which is lower and worse.
MI Value
(92.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (90.8%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (90.1%).
Prior Value
(90.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Persons with Health Insurance

Current Value:
91.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 91.6% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 93.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 92.4%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 91.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.4%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,140 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (94.0%), Alcona has a value of 91.6% which is lower and worse.
MI Value
(94.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (91.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (91.3%).
Prior Value
(91.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (92.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(92.4%)
<div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Preventable Hospital Stays: Medicare Population

Current Value:
1,953
Discharges per 100,000 Medicare enrollees
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 1,953 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,449 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2,880.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 1,953 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2,729 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 3,375.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (3,261), Alcona has a value of 1,953 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(3,261)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (2,677), Alcona has a value of 1,953 which is lower and better.
US Value
(2,677)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (1,953) is less and better than the previously measured value (2,318).
Prior Value
(2,318)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona

Health / Health Information Technology

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona Persons with an Internet Subscription

Current Value:
83.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 83.5% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 88.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 84.9%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 83.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 87.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 83.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (90.8%), Alcona has a value of 83.5% which is lower and worse.
MI Value
(90.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (91.0%), Alcona has a value of 83.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(91.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alcona value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona

Health / Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona Age-Adjusted Hospitalization Rate due to Heart Attack

44.6
Hospitalizations per 10,000 population 35+ years
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 44.6 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 30.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.7.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (30.8), Alcona has a value of 44.6 which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(30.8)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (44.6) is less and better than the previously measured value (47.6).
Prior Value
(47.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Atrial Fibrillation: Medicare Population

Current Value:
15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 15.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 15.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (15.0%), Alcona has a value of 15.0%.
MI Value
(15.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (14.0%), Alcona has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (15.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15.0%).
Prior Value
(15.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Heart Failure: Medicare Population

Current Value:
11.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 11.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (13.0%), Alcona has a value of 11.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Alcona has a value of 11.0%.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (11.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (11.0%).
Prior Value
(11.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Hyperlipidemia: Medicare Population

Current Value:
57.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 57.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 61.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 64.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 57.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 63.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (62.0%), Alcona has a value of 57.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(62.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Alcona has a value of 57.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (57.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (55.0%).
Prior Value
(55.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Hypertension: Medicare Population

Current Value:
65.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 65.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 64.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 67.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 65.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 67.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 71.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (66.0%), Alcona has a value of 65.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(66.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (65.0%), Alcona has a value of 65.0%.
US Value
(65.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (65.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (66.0%).
Prior Value
(66.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Ischemic Heart Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
20.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 20.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 20.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 22.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 20.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (22.0%), Alcona has a value of 20.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(22.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (21.0%), Alcona has a value of 20.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(21.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (20.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (21.0%).
Prior Value
(21.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Stroke: Medicare Population

Current Value:
5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 5.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (6.0%), Alcona has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Alcona has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (5.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (5.0%).
Prior Value
(5.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona

Health / Immunizations & Infectious Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona Flu Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
26.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 26.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 41.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 33.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 26.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 43.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 36.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (47.0%), Alcona has a value of 26.0% which is lower and worse.
MI Value
(47.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (50.0%), Alcona has a value of 26.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(50.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (26.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (26.0%).
Prior Value
(26.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Pneumonia Vaccinations: Medicare Population

Current Value:
4.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 4.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 4.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 4.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 5.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (7.0%), Alcona has a value of 4.0% which is lower and worse.
MI Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.0%), Alcona has a value of 4.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(8.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (4.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (3.0%).
Prior Value
(3.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona

Health / Maternal, Fetal & Infant Health

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona Mothers who Received Early Prenatal Care

Current Value:
81.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 81.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 75.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 67.9%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (76.3%), Alcona has a value of 81.9% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(76.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (75.3%), Alcona has a value of 81.9% which is higher and better.
US Value
(75.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (81.9%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (77.3%).
Prior Value
(77.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona

Health / Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona Depression: Medicare Population

Current Value:
16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 16.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 18.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (18.0%), Alcona has a value of 16.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.0%), Alcona has a value of 16.0%.
US Value
(16.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (16.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.0%).
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona

Health / Older Adults

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona Adults 65+ with a Disability

Current Value:
35.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (32.7%), Alcona has a value of 35.9%.
MI Value
(32.7%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (33.3%), Alcona has a value of 35.9%.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alcona value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Adults 65+ with a Hearing Difficulty

Current Value:
19.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (13.6%), Alcona has a value of 19.9%.
MI Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.7%), Alcona has a value of 19.9%.
US Value
(13.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alcona value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Adults 65+ with a Self-Care Difficulty

Current Value:
5.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (6.8%), Alcona has a value of 5.1%.
MI Value
(6.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.4%), Alcona has a value of 5.1%.
US Value
(7.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alcona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Adults 65+ with a Vision Difficulty

Current Value:
3.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (5.3%), Alcona has a value of 3.5%.
MI Value
(5.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Alcona has a value of 3.5%.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alcona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Adults 65+ with an Independent Living Difficulty

Current Value:
9.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (13.1%), Alcona has a value of 9.2%.
MI Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (13.6%), Alcona has a value of 9.2%.
US Value
(13.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alcona value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Alzheimer's Disease or Dementia: Medicare Population

5.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 5.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 6.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (7.0%), Alcona has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.0%), Alcona has a value of 5.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(6.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (5.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona

Health / Other Conditions

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona Chronic Kidney Disease: Medicare Population

Current Value:
14.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 14.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 14.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 19.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (19.0%), Alcona has a value of 14.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Alcona has a value of 14.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (14.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (16.0%).
Prior Value
(16.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Osteoporosis: Medicare Population

Current Value:
7.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 7.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (10.0%), Alcona has a value of 7.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Alcona has a value of 7.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (7.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Rheumatoid Arthritis or Osteoarthritis: Medicare Population

31.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 31.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 37.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 31.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 35.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 38.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (36.0%), Alcona has a value of 31.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(36.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (35.0%), Alcona has a value of 31.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(35.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (31.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (32.0%).
Prior Value
(32.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona

Health / Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona Adults 20+ who are Sedentary

Current Value:
13.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 13.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.2%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 13.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 18.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.9%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (13.7%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (16.8%).
Prior Value
(16.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona

Health / Respiratory Diseases

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona Asthma: Medicare Population

Current Value:
6.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 6.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 6.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (7.0%), Alcona has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (7.0%), Alcona has a value of 6.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(7.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (6.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (6.0%).
Prior Value
(6.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona COPD: Medicare Population

Current Value:

County: Alcona COPD: Medicare Population

15.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 15.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 14.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 15.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 12.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 14.0%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,129 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (13.0%), Alcona has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(13.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (11.0%), Alcona has a value of 15.0% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(11.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (15.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (17.0%).
Prior Value
(17.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona

Health / Sexually Transmitted Infections

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona Chlamydia Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Alcona Chlamydia Incidence Rate

124.8
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 124.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 201.1 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 272.3.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 124.8 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 294.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 467.6.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (428.3), Alcona has a value of 124.8 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(428.3)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (495.0), Alcona has a value of 124.8 which is lower and better.
US Value
(495.0)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (124.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (195.4).
Prior Value
(195.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Alcona Gonorrhea Incidence Rate

0.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 0.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 81.7.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 0.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.2 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 169.5.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (163.2), Alcona has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(163.2)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (194.4), Alcona has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(194.4)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (0.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (9.8).
Prior Value
(9.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona HIV Prevalence Rate

Current Value:

County: Alcona HIV Prevalence Rate

52.7
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (205.5), Alcona has a value of 52.7.
MI Value
(205.5)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (386.6), Alcona has a value of 52.7.
US Value
(386.6)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (52.7) is less  than the previously measured value (53.5).
Prior Value
(53.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Syphilis Incidence Rate

Current Value:

County: Alcona Syphilis Incidence Rate

0.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 0.0 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 2.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 5.9.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (9.7), Alcona has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
MI Value
(9.7)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (17.7), Alcona has a value of 0.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(17.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (0.0) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.0).
Prior Value
(0.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona

Health / Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona Adults 20+ Who Are Obese

Current Value:

County: Alcona Adults 20+ Who Are Obese

18.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 18.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 32.6%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 18.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 28.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 33.1%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,074 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (18.9%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (19.5%).
Prior Value
(19.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.0%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona

Community / Demographics

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona Total Population

Current Value:

County: Alcona Total Population

10,489
People
(2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (10,489) is greater  than the previously measured value (10,397).
Prior Value
(10,397)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Over time, the Alcona value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Veteran Population

Current Value:

County: Alcona Veteran Population

14.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (6.3%), Alcona has a value of 14.0%.
MI Value
(6.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (6.6%), Alcona has a value of 14.0%.
US Value
(6.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alcona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona

Community / Transportation

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona Households without a Vehicle

Current Value:
3.5%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the MI Value (7.2%), Alcona has a value of 3.5%.
MI Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.3%), Alcona has a value of 3.5%.
US Value
(8.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alcona value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Mean Travel Time to Work

Current Value:

County: Alcona Mean Travel Time to Work

26.5
Minutes
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 26.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 23.9 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.6.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 26.5 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 24.0 while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.8.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (24.5), Alcona has a value of 26.5 which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(24.5)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (26.7), Alcona has a value of 26.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(26.7)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alcona value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 0.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 0.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 0.2%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to the MI Value (1.1%), Alcona has a value of 0.0% which is lower and worse.
MI Value
(1.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Alcona has a value of 0.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alcona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Workers who Drive Alone to Work

Current Value:
76.7%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 76.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 80.8%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 76.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 79.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 82.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (77.1%), Alcona has a value of 76.7% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(77.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (71.7%), Alcona has a value of 76.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(71.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alcona value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Workers who Walk to Work

Current Value:

County: Alcona Workers who Walk to Work

3.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 3.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.6%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 3.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 2.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 1.2%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (2.1%), Alcona has a value of 3.0% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(2.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (2.4%), Alcona has a value of 3.0% which is higher and better.
US Value
(2.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alcona value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona

Economy / Housing & Homes

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

55.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 55.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 47.0% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 51.8%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 55.3% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 44.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 49.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (49.0%), Alcona has a value of 55.3% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(49.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Alcona has a value of 55.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alcona value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona

Economy / Income

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona Gender Pay Gap

Current Value:

County: Alcona Gender Pay Gap

$0.69
Cents on the dollar
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of $0.69 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $0.69 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $0.63.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of $0.69 which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $0.69 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $0.64.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,124 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value ($0.68), Alcona has a value of $0.69 which is higher and better.
MI Value
($0.68)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value ($0.72), Alcona has a value of $0.69 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($0.72)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alcona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Median Household Income

Current Value:

County: Alcona Median Household Income

$50,295
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of $50,295 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $59,467 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $54,132.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of $50,295 which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $60,831 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $52,521.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value ($68,505), Alcona has a value of $50,295 which is lower and worse.
MI Value
($68,505)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value ($75,149), Alcona has a value of $50,295 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($75,149)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alcona value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Per Capita Income

Current Value:

County: Alcona Per Capita Income

$31,167
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of $31,167 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $32,679 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $29,736.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of $31,167 which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than $32,340 while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than $28,112.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value ($37,929), Alcona has a value of $31,167 which is lower and worse.
MI Value
($37,929)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value ($41,261), Alcona has a value of $31,167 which is lower and worse.
US Value
($41,261)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alcona value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona

Economy / Poverty

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
24.1%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 24.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 21.7%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 24.1% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 24.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (17.8%), Alcona has a value of 24.1% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(17.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (16.7%), Alcona has a value of 24.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(16.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alcona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Families Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
9.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 9.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.3%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 9.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,104 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (8.8%), Alcona has a value of 9.6% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (8.8%), Alcona has a value of 9.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(8.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alcona value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona People 65+ Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
7.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 7.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 8.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.9%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 7.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 9.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.8%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (9.0%), Alcona has a value of 7.8% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(9.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (10.0%), Alcona has a value of 7.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alcona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona People Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
15.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 15.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 15.3%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 15.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 13.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (13.1%), Alcona has a value of 15.8% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Alcona has a value of 15.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alcona value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Young Children Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
31.4%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 31.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 26.8%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 31.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 19.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 27.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,131 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (20.1%), Alcona has a value of 31.4% which is higher and worse.
MI Value
(20.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (18.1%), Alcona has a value of 31.4% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(18.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alcona value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Youth not in School or Working

Current Value:
0.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.6%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 0.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 1.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 2.7%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,130 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (2.0%), Alcona has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
MI Value
(2.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (1.8%), Alcona has a value of 0.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(1.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alcona value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona

Education / Educational Attainment

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona

Education / Educational Attainment

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona People 25+ with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher

Current Value:
20.0%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 20.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 21.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 17.2%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 20.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 20.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.5%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (31.1%), Alcona has a value of 20.0% which is lower and worse.
MI Value
(31.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (34.3%), Alcona has a value of 20.0% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(34.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alcona value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona People 25+ with a High School Diploma or Higher

Current Value:
91.2%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 91.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 91.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 90.0%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 91.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 89.5% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 85.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (91.8%), Alcona has a value of 91.2% which is lower and worse.
MI Value
(91.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (89.1%), Alcona has a value of 91.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(89.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alcona value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona Veterans with a High School Diploma or Higher

Current Value:
94.9%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 94.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 94.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 93.4%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 94.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 94.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 91.6%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,132 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (94.6%), Alcona has a value of 94.9% which is higher and better.
MI Value
(94.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the US Value (95.0%), Alcona has a value of 94.9% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(95.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Alcona value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV

County: Alcona

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona

Environmental Health / Built Environment

Value
Compared to:

County: Alcona Access to Parks

Current Value:

County: Alcona Access to Parks

53.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to MI Counties, Alcona has a value of 53.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 50.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 35.8%.
MI Counties
The distribution is based on data from 83 Michigan counties.
Compared to U.S. Counties, Alcona has a value of 53.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50%  have a value higher than 24.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 9.3%.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,141 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
Compared to the MI Value (59.6%), Alcona has a value of 53.5% which is lower and worse.
MI Value
(59.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Michigan State value.
Compared to the prior value, Alcona (53.5%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (44.3%).
Prior Value
(44.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
  • Download JPEG
  • Download PDF
  • Download CSV